Look to see how Murray is characterized in socializing books for comp/rhet: Cross Talk, Norton...
An Open Letter to Donald Murray's Scholarly Grandchildren
Something like this could work as a title...here's what they didn't tell you. Here's what you learn if you look closer. Tom's quote from the new book helps me as a framing device:
We hope that this collection will allow a new generation of writing teachers and aspiring writers to appreciate both the utility and depth of Don's work. We also believe that a healthy rereading of his work will establish his significance at a time when he has been marginalized by the field of composition that he helped create, an exclusion that he felt keenly in the last decade of his life. (x)
And if this is what I am planning to do, what are the claims or positions I'll be offering, what am I writing against?
- Murray as Critical Pedagogue
- Murray as Rhetorician
- Murray as social/epistemic theorist
Another thing I might do, in addition to try to write against the way of thinking about Don's work that the "new generation" are likely to encounter, is show them what about Don they need and perhaps also the extent to which he is the source for much of what they do.
The things that they need to teach that often aren't talked about so much but which Don does talk about:
Being In process (Don was always modeling the fact that he was a lifelong learner)
Writing to Learn (that writing can and should be used as a way of thinking)
Craft--butt in chair, writer's write, that sort of thing...how to actually get the work done
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.