It occurs to me that Murray was very much a reformer in the progressive tradition, at the highest level. This was shaped in part by his childhood, a desire to reform the dull, monotonous, abusive schools of his day. Also, there was a desire to reform English. Two traditions to reform:
- traditional schools, rote learning, skill-and-drill, students need to be disciplined
- traditional English, where literature reigns supreme, lecture is king, etc.
Social class and his upbringing…see footnote 61 in Reese article (p. 22) and footnote 1 (p. v)
A chapter before we get into the history, tackling Murray’s beliefs at the highest levels about teaching and learning and situating them within his own history?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.